|
References Baker, R. L., and H. F. Clifford. 1982. Life cycle of an Enallagma boreale Selys population from the boreal forest of Alberta, Canada (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica 11(4):317-322. Calvert, P. P. 1902, in Calvert, P. P. 1901-1908. Odonata. In Biologia Centrali Americana: Insecta Neuroptera. R. H. Porter & Dulau & Co.: London. Dec 1902, p. 114. Calvert, P. P. 1919. Gundlach's work on the Odonata of Cuba: a critical study. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 45:335-396. Cannings, R. A. 1989. Enallagma basidens Calvert, a dragonfly new to Canada, with notes on the expansion of its range in North America (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Notulae Odonatologicae 3(4):53-55. Charpentier, T. de. 1840. Libellulinae europaeae descriptae e depictae. Lipsiae, Leopold Voss. 180 pp. Donnelly, T. W. 1989. The status of Enallagma cyathigerum (Charp.) and E. vernale Gloyd in south-central New York (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica 18:373-378. Gloyd, L. K. 1943. Enallagma vernale, a new species of Odonata from Michigan. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 479:1-8. Hagen, H. A. 1861. Synopsis of the neuroptera of North America, with a list of the South American species. Smithsonia Miscellaneous Collections 4:1-347. Ingham, B. R., and C. E. Jenner. 1976. Life histories of Enallagma hageni (Walsh) and E. aspersum (Hagen) (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica 5:331-345. Johannsson, O. E. 1978. Co-existence of larval Zygoptera (Odonata) common to the Norfolk Broads (U.K.). Oecologia 32:303-321. Kellicot, D. S. 1895. Catalogue of the Odonata of Ohio, Part 1. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History 17:195-216. Kormondy, E. J., and J. L. Gower. 1965. Life history variations in an association of Odonata. Ecology 46:882-886. Macan, T. T. 1964. The Odonata of a moorland fishpond. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 49:325-360. Morse, A. P. 1895. New North American Odonata. Psyche 7:207-211. O'Brien, M. F., and P. D. Pratt. 1999 (In press). Enallagma anna, a damselfly new to the Great Lakes region (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). The Great Lakes Entomologist 32(1). Pearlstone, P. S. M. 1973. The food of damselfly larvae in Marion Lake, British Columbia. Syesis 6:33-39. Say, T. 1839. Descriptions of new North American neuropterous insects and observations on some already described by (the late) Th. Say. Journal of the Academy of Natural Science of Philadelphia 8:9-46. Selys-Longchamps, E. de. 1875. Notes on Odonata from Newfoundland collected in 1874 by Mr. John Milne. Entomologists Monthly Magazine 11:241-243. Selys-Longchamps, E. de. 1876. Synopsis des agrionines, cinquième légion: Arion (suite). Le genre Agrion. Bulletin de l'Académie royale des Sciences de Belgique (2) 42:480-531. Walker, E. M. 1953. The Odonata of Canada and Alaska, Vol. 1. University of Toronto Press: Toronto, Ontario. xi + 292 pp. Walsh, B. D. 1862. List of the Pseudoneuroptera of Illinois contained in the cabinet of the writer, with descriptions of over forty new species, and notes on their structural affinities. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Philadelphia 1862:361-402. Walsh, B. D. 1863. Observations on certain N. A. neuroptera by Hagen, M. D., of Konigsberg, Prussia; translated from the original French MS., and published by permission of the author, with notes and descriptions of about twenty new N. A. species of Pseudoneuroptera. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Philadelphia 2:167-272. [note: see also Walsh, B. D. 1862 for original description of adults, which were named in Walsh 1863. Source: Westfall and May 1996 ). Westfall, M. J., Jr. and M. L. May. 1996. Damselflies of North America. Scientific Publishers: Gainesville, Florida. x + 650 pp. |
| In The Origin of Species, Charles Darwin commented, sexual
selection, "depends, not on a struggle for existence, but on a struggle between the males for possession of
females; the result is not death to the unsuccessful competitors, but few or no offspring."
In the insect order Odonata (dragonfly and demselfly), the primary goal of an adult male is to secure mates and therefore in the polygynous mating system, competition for mating opportunities exists. Many different reproductive tactics have evolved to optimize the number of opportunities to successfully reproduce with females. The territorial behavior exhibited by many Odonata exemplifies Darwin's theory of sexual selection. In Dragonflies, the territorial behavior is exhibited in order to gain access to the female. Territorial behavior is defined to be a defended area used exclusively by an individual (Brown and Orians, 1970). In Odonata species that exhibit territorial behavior, copulation and oviposition are carried out within or near the territory (Conrad and Pritchard, 1992). Since the Odonata are aquatic insects, the adult female oviposits on the water surface, often near vegetation. Several variations of the ovipositioning behavior exist in the insect order, but as a result, the male has become territorial of these oviposition sites respective to its species (Corbet, 1962). Since the acquisition of a territory is correlated to the number of mating opportunities, the territorial behavior is extremely important to the sexual selection of the Odonata. |
At this point, the primary goal of the dragonfly or damselfly is to find a mate. With their keen eyesight, the adult begins to search for prey and mates. Searching for food does not occur in the territories, however if prey enters the territory, the Odonata will feed (Clausnitzer, 1996). A high variation of flight habits exist within the insect order. Many Odonata will perch at one site whereas others may remain in flight while looking for both prey and mates. The subject of interest involves the Odonata species that remain at one site, often patrolling the area for mating opportunities and exclusion of male conspecifics. This territorial behavior increases reproductive fitness (Hilton, 1984; Alcock, 1987). Within the order, a variety of territorial behaviors exist ranging from residency and intolerance of conspecific males to aggressive behavior without a strong site attachment (Van Buskirk, 1986). Resource defense polygyny involves the intraspecific male competition to control the sites attractive to the adult female (Alcock, 1987;1990;Conrad and Pritchard, 1992). If the female is attracted to a species specific oviposition site, successful establishment of resource defense polygyny within the species is likely. In this mating system, the areas that are monopolized by the male Odonata are the oviposition sites of the female. The males are found at these sites before the first female arrives to mate. The exhibition of a protandrous system allows time to establish the ownership of territories. Of the insect order Odonata, resource defense polygyny offers many species enhanced male mating success. Resource defense polygyny results in the territorial behavior of oviposition sites as the males compete to monopolize these resources to increase their chances of mating with a female. In the insect order, the adult female oviposits after mating in the water, usually near or in patches of vegetation. Different oviposition resources are monopolized by different species. In several studies, males of a species are seen to be defending territories that are suitable to their female conspecifics. In the morning , the adult male is first to arrive at the mating site. Since the male can mate several times, it is to its advantage to locate itself in an area where many females will be found. In this case, near the oviposition sites. Since there are a limited amount of suitable oviposition sites around a pond or stream, competition for the sites exist among the males. Territorial Behavior After a male Odonata has established a territory, several other males will enter the site hoping to find a receptive female near the oviposition site. The owner of a territory may perch on vegetation or patrol the territory in search of mating opportunities. However, several other male Odonates do not claim a territory because resources are limited. These Odonates are often referred to as "roamers" or "flyers" (Sandell and Liberg, 1992). Once these males enter the territory of another male, several types of territorial behaviors may be displayed. In a dragonfly species, Leucorrhinia hudsonica, the territory owner seems to have the ability to recognize conspecific males and males of other species(Hilton, 1984). The territorial male will leave his perch to chase away conspecific males, but will not pursue a chase if the male Odonate is not of the same species. The male territory owner will flutter its wings in a warning to the intruder. These wing warnings are common in the territorial species of Zygoptera. If the intruder (conspecific male) has entered the boundaries of the territory, the territory-owner will pursue a chase flight. A chase flight may involve clashes of the two insects. These clashes were very brief lasting only a few seconds, but the attacks were directed toward the abdomen of the chased male from the male pursuing the chase. The chase may be a rapid twisting entanglement where the clashes involve grappling of legs and mouthparts or one male be fleeing the territory. The winner returns to the territory and perches, waiting for the arrival of a receptive female. In several damselfly species of the families Coenagrionidae and Lestidae, a similar signal is employed to advertise ownership of a territory. Termed as "wing clapping," the damselfly moves forward keeping the meso- and metathoracic wings together during the movement. The damselfly then returns to its resting position (Hilton, 1984). In the family Chlorocyphidae, several species were studied extensively to review their territorial behavior (Orr, 1996). A high amount of intraspecific variation of the territorial behavior was confirmed. Libellago aurantiaca establish territories that range from 1.5 to 3 meters in diameter. Upon encountering an intruder, the two males face the other and make forward movements without contact. In the dispute, the abdomens are held horizontally while the forewings are held forward. Often one male will hold the forewings stationary for a brief second so as to display the dark apical spot. As a result, the other male will often flee the territory. Libelluga stictica defends a territory from an intruding male in a similar manner where the pair faces each other and then rises vertically rapidly. The stationary wing display and forward lunges are also involved in the territorial dispute until one male flees the area. Libelluga semiopaca contests for territories are more time consuming than those disputes of both L. aurantiaca and L. stictica lasting a mean time of 4.7 minutes. Once again the males face each other and hover rather than move vertically during the territorial dispute. The pair rotates horizontally 90 degrees and offer a series of stationary wing displays until a winner is decided. Rhinoneura villosipes settle territorial disputes in a similar manner to that of L. semiopaca. The stationary wing display involves the hindwings rather than the forewings to offer the opponent a view of the dark apical mark. Rhinocypha aurofulgens employs the stationary wing display while ascending rapidly and displaying the abdomen by bending it upward. Once the pair has ascended approximately 1 to 2 meters, they descend and reengage or the loser is chased out of the territory by the victor. Rhinocypha humeralis do not employ the stationary wing display, but rather make a series of darts toward the opponent while rotating slightly in the horizontal plane. Of the many displays of territorial behavior, variation exists to a large degree possibly due to several factors such as larval ecology, residency, time of day, weather conditions, age and size of the dragonfly or damselfly. Several behaviors of the territoriality have been described, but what determines the winner of a territorial dispute? Several factors have been shown to sway the outcome of a territorial contest of two males. The relationships between these many variables are still unknown and many have been shown to be contradictory. Time of Day/Weather As true with most insects, the temperature regulated the activity of the Odonata. Temperatures below 25 degrees Celsius slowed the activity whereas an optimal temperature above 30 degrees Celsius increased activity (Jacobs, 1955). Also, weather conditions greatly affected the activity of the Odonata (Hilton, 1984). On warm sunny days, flight activity increased, therefore increasing the number of intraspecific interactions. During overcast weather conditions, males were not located at the oviposition sites. The time spent at oviposition sites varies for male and female Odonata. The males arrive as early as 9 am and leave as late as 6 PM depending on the species. The females arrive several hours later after the males have established territorial possession of the oviposition sites (Campanella, 1975). In a study of Brechmorhoga pertinax, the male arrives at the oviposition sites around 9:30 am and activity decreases around 2:30 PM. Throughout the day, male activity is correlated with the presence of females which is at an optimum between 12:30 and 1 PM. The males exhibit the highest patrolling activity of their territory during this time (Alcock, 1987). Both the time of day and weather conditions serve as parameters for evaluating territorial behavior. Larval Ecology The larvae of Odonata have shown feeding territoriality in laboratory experiments. The success of larvae in feeding territoriality has been shown to positively influence the reproductive success of the adult male(Harvey and Corbet, 1985). Since a larger adult size is advantageous to reproductive success, a larvae that has reached a larger size by the final-instar larvae would enhance its reproductive fitness. Food availability has little effect on the survival of Odonata larvae, it may, however affect the size of the instar at the final molt. In a study of Pyrrhosoma nymphula larvae, the last three or four instars were supplied with low and high amounts of food to determine the effect of food availability on adult size. Food availability was found to be positively correlated with the body length of the Odonata. Size In turn, the consequences of territorial behavior on the larval ecology of a damselfly were studied in relation to the adult size of Megaloprepus coerulatus (Fincke, 1992). Since larger males win more territorial contests, his chances of defending a desirable oviposition site are greater. Also, it is suggested that larger males exhibit greater success of defending larger territories that are highly desirable to female conspecifics. In the Megaloprepus coerulatus, the female oviposits in tree holes. Larger tree holes are desirable oviposition sites because they can support a greater number of offspring. Therefore, larger males that can retain a large tree hole as its territory is increasing its reproductive fitness in terms of the number and quality of offspring. Several studies have shown the larger size of the adult male to be advantageous to the reproductive fitness of the Odonata (Fraser and Herman, 1993;Marden and Waage, 1990; Tsubaki and Ono, 1987). Despite this fact, variation persists in the insect order. In a study of Libellula quadrimaculata, the larger males were demonstrated to be at a disadvantage as a result of their size (Convey, 1989). The larger males had a lower proportion of muscle mass relative to the rest of their body and therefore, were determined to have a lower level of maneuverability when compared to smaller males. Apparently, due to their larger size, the power output is lower than that of smaller males and therefore, larger males can not accelerate as rapidly as smaller males. As a result, the larger males were unable to retain territories and resorted to satellite (roaming) behavior as other smaller males of other species. Age In the Nannothemis bella, a Libellulid dragonfly, the date of emergence affects the ability of the male to retain territories (Lee and McGinn, 1986). A late emergence date reduces the ability of the dragonfly to hold a territory and therefore may affect the reproductive fitness. The dragonfly that emerged later than the majority of its conspecifics has less time to reproduce in that season. In addition, the territories have already reached levels where a high amount of competition exists for the males. The age of a dragonfly or damselfly affects the ability to obtain or retain a desirable oviposition site (Tsubaki and Ono, 1987). Younger males won more territorial disputes suggesting that age may be more of a component in determining the victor of a territorial contest. In addition, Calopteryx maculata males that have been adults for longer than 20 days represented a low proportion of the males possessing territories (Forsyth and Montgomerie, 1987). The low number of older males retaining a territory is due to displacement by younger males 5 to 20 days into their reproductive adult stage. In a comparison of winners and losers of territorial contests, the group of winners were significantly younger than the group of losers. male mating success and territorial possession decrease with age. Residency Residency of a territorial site has been suggested to increase the male's ability to win a territorial contest. Territorial contests between residents and intruders were evaluated to determine if residents did indeed have an advantage in the dispute (Gribbin and Thompson, 1991). The mean masses of the territory residents and intruders were shown to have no significant difference. Ruling out size as a determining factor of a victory, the residents were suggested to possess an advantage in a territorial contest. In this study of the damselfly Pyrrhosoma nymphula, the residency asymmetry was determined to settle the territorial disputes. In a study of the damselfly Calopteryx maculata, the territorial disputes between males of adjacent territories were evaluated (Waage, 1988). Two males may become residents of one territory or two overlapping territories. The resident male patrols his territory and may not see the intruder before he has established the territory as his own. The intensity and duration of these disputes were greater than a normal resident/intruder bout suggesting that the advantages offered by residency were canceled out. This suggests that residency may offer both an advantage and a disadvantage to the resident. The duration of bouts between the adjacent residents escalated, lasting longer and therefore expending more energy. Final Comments Territorial behavior exhibited by the Odonata vary greatly in many aspects among species (Hilton, 1984; Orr, 1996). Many different behaviors have evolved to optimize the number of opportunities to successfully reproduce with females. The parameters that affect territorial behavior and the outcome of the territorial contests vary to a high extent. Several different components are involved with odonate territorial behavior, specifically, larval ecology, previous residency, time of day, weather, size and age have been shown to influence territory possession (Fincke, 1992; Harvey and Corbet, 1992; Tsubaki and Ono, 1987; Gribbin and Thompson, 1991). Of these components, larval ecology determined the size of the adult male (Harvey and Corbet, 1985). The larger size of the adult male offered the Odonate an advantage to retain desirable territories and therefore, was concluded to increase reproductive fitness (Fincke, 1992; Fraser and Herman, 1993;Marden and Waage, 1990; Tsubaki and Ono, 1987). In another species, a large body size was shown to negatively correlate with reproductive fitness, leaving this character unreliable as to determining the outcome of territorial disputes ( Convey, 1989). In addition, Gribbin and Thompson determined that the body mass of Pyrrhosoma nymphul offered no advantages or disadvantages to the territorial males (Gribbin and Thompson, 1991). A determining characteristic of a victor of a territorial contest involved the age of the adult male. In these studies, the younger males appeared to have an advantage of retaining a territory. As a result, generalizations of territorial behavior across the order are difficult to apply. Overall , determining characteristics of a winning territorial male Odonate vary greatly among species. Until further research determines a reliable winning character or behavior, each species' territorial behavior must be studied individually.